Archives for the month of: juliol, 2009

Crec que aquest text, publicat a Harvard Business Publishing és molt interessant.

In the months since Barack Obama has taken office, a curious thing has occurred in his communication style. He has toned down the rhetoric and geared up the details. As Don Baer who once worked for President Bill Clinton put it, Obama is now “the Great Explainer.”

In doing so, Obama is following in the tradition of a previous president, Franklin Roosevelt. At his best, Roosevelt, either on radio or to the press, took on the role of a trusted friend explaining things in simple terms so that anyone could understand them. For example, Roosevelt compared the U.S. program of Lend Lease to Britain in 1941 to a neighbor lending a garden hose to a neighbor trying to put out a house fire.

Explanation is a key attribute of leadership communications. Leaders know to inject their communications with verve and enthusiasm as a means of persuasion, but they also need to include an explanation for the excitement. What does it mean and why are we doing it are critical questions that every leader must answer with straightforward explanations. Here are three ways to become an effective explainer.

Define what it is. The purpose of an explanation is to describe the issue, the initiative, or the problem. For example, if you are pushing for cost reductions, explain why they are necessary and what they will entail. Put the cost reductions into the context of business operations. Be certain to explicate the benefits.

Define what it isn’t. Here is where the leader moves into the “never assume mode.” Be clear to define the exclusions. For example, returning to our cost reduction issue, if you are asking for reductions in costs, not people, be explicit. Otherwise employees will assume they are being axed. Leave no room for assumptions. This is not simply true for potential layoffs but for any business issue.

Define what you want people to do. This becomes an opportunity to issue the call for action. Establishing expectations is critical. Cost reductions mean employees will have to do more with less; explain what that will entail in clear and precise terms. Leaders can also use the expectations step as a challenge for people to think and do differently. Your explanation then takes on broader significance.

Good explainers need to be careful, however, not to overdo the details. In a town hall meeting format, the leader sketches the facts and supports them with data points. Dwelling too long on a single point, or points, risks not simply boring the audience but confusing them. Save detailed explanations, which are necessary, for written documentation or team meetings. The latter presents an opportunity for the next level of leaders to translate the communications into action steps.

As such, detailed explanations work well in face-to-face situations, or in team meetings. They become opportunities to elaborate on possibilities. More important, they also allow individuals to offer their feedback, something that typically cannot occur in large-scale town hall events. The explanation becomes an invitation for discussion, and skillful leaders use it to communicate not simply facts, but also to engage support for their ideas.

One final point. Explanations may include aspirations. On March 31, 1945, Franklin Roosevelt gave a briefing to Congress on his meeting with Churchill and Stalin at Yalta in which the future of post-War Europe was discussed.

During the course of his presentation to Congress, as H.W. Brands writes in a brilliant new biography of Roosevelt,Traitor to His Class, the President, only weeks from death, mused momentarily to talk about the need for enduring peace. “Twenty-five years ago, American fighting men [in reference to World War I] looked to the world to finish the work of peace for which they fought and suffered. We failed them then. We cannot fail them again.”

FDR, like all good leaders, knew how to close a good explanation with an equally good challenge; it puts people on notice and gives them a reason for action.

http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/baldoni/2009/06/great_communicators_are_great.html

Sitges ha estat escenari d’un fet que a priori només passa a Hollywood. Ara ho hem viscut a pocs metres de casa nostra. La justícia és l’única sortida al conflicte. Ara bé, creieu que és justa i igualitària?

Dimarts passat els mitjans de comunicació informaven sobre un fet horrible. Un carrer molt cèntric del municipi havia estat l’escenari d’un homicidi. Una cua per comprar patates al carrer Parellades s’havia convertit en l’excusa perfecte per a treure la vida al jove Joel de 19 anys i veí d’Olivella.

La primera pregunta que em faig és: per què arribem a aquest punt? Què ens porta a matar algú per una discussió ridícula, penosa i sense sentit? Un cas d’aquestes característiques té alguna mena de justificació?

L’aparell judicial té l’obligació de resoldre el cas per la via pacífica. De moment, els Mossos d’Esquadra han detingut a 4 individus i sembla que entre ells hi ha el pressumpte autor dels fets. L’estat de dret és el sistema pel qual l’estat garanteix els drets individuals dels ciutadans. Tothom és innocent fins que no es demostri el contrari. Ara bé, el gran dilema arriba un cop se sap qui és el culpable dels fets. En aquest moment s’obre un dilem moral que està en plena efervescència.

Falten encara uns quants mesos per saber el veredicte del jutge i no pretenc fer un judici paral·lel. No només pretenc agafar aquest cas com a exemple, sinó molts d’altres que apareixen de forma més o menys sensacionalista en els mitjans. Vull que quedi ben clar que no parlo d’immigrants perquè no és una característica d’ells, no ens pensem que som tant superiors.

Anar drogat, begut, ser menor d’edat i altres aspectes atenuants poden rebaixar substancialment la pena. Què se li pot dir a una mare que perd el fill a mans d’una persona que al cap de “pocs” anys sortirà de la presó? Hi ha algú que tingui el dret d’acabar amb la nostra vida?

La justícia és massa tova? S’està perdent el civisme per moments? Cal una remodelació de la legislació per a poder lluitar contra aquesta mena de casos? El que està clar és que un no es pot quedar sense paraules davant d’un fet d’aquestes característiques.

  

Entrevista a Pere Forés, creador de l’Ictineu 3, el primer submarí català i espanyol. Està previst que s’acabi el 2010, si es concedeixen els 400.000 euros que falten per finalitzar el projecte.

Aquesta entrevista es va dur a terme en el context de l”Àttic 09, la Fira Internacional d’idees i invents de Vilanova i la Geltrú, que es va celebrar del 26 al 28 de juny.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.